Today, even preschoolers are able to watch cartoons on a desktop, play games on a smartphone, and listen to music at the same time. As part of the study, the schoolchildren were asked to log their online and offline events.

PCWorld Categories

The first category included events when they used gadgets or PCs browsed the internet, communicated on social media etc. The second category involved those events not related to any devices. Reports in mass media often suggest that gadgets distract children during lessons, which affects their academic progress.

And this would, on the face of it, seem logical. But no such correlation was detected, Diana Koroleva said. Participants in school contests are a special category. They check their smartphones more rarely during lessons, since they are preparing for subject contests and are highly involved in studies during their classes. This conservative approach impacts three essential aspects of school life:. At the same time, some signs that schools are changing are evident.

Why I Don’t Use A Smart Phone - Ann Makosinski - TEDxTeen

Teachers and students use email for communication more often, and the teachers assign homework that has to be done online or with the use of the internet, the researchers noted. How Smartphones Help Study Teachers should be more tolerant of the fact that children check their phones and tablets during classes. Moreover, these devices should be more actively used in the learning process. Education children internet school.

Hard yet Profitable. What are the limits of frankness in posts about sexual violence. Power of Negative Example. Instagram Micro-celebrities. What factors contribute to online endorser credibility and influence consumer behaviour? Mathematical Expression of t he above Model. The linear equation based expression of the a bove conceptual framework is:. The coefficients will be determined in way that the dependent groups of stude nts i. Figure 2: Attentive and Inattentive university students ar e different from each other in terms of their purpose of.

The purp oses of using smartphones co nsidered to be GOOD for educational benefits are have. The purposes of using smartp hones considered to be BAD for ed ucational benefits are have sig nificant. Table 3: Having good and so und academic profiles e. Having poor academic profiles e. Using smartphones for phone call, text messaging, MMS, chatting,. Using smartphones for watching entertaining videos, listening to.

When deprived of food and smartphones, college students work harder to get their phones back

Using smartphones for learning and knowing new in formation,. Using smartphones for maintaining online based social community. Being updated in terms of technolo gical knowledge OV1. Preparing regular home works OV1. Improving class performance OV1. Study related contents sharing O V1. Games Online or Offline OV2.

Using smartphones during class lect ure OV2. Only watching videos OV2. Only listening to the music OV2. Only for maintaining social networking communica tions. Excessive phone calling, chatting or messaging OV2. Cell-phone based dating OV2.

  1. Discover the world's research!
  2. gps mobile tracker online india.
  3. bejeweled blitz free mobile download.
  4. Students beware: Your smartphone could be damaging your education!

Categorized as heavy, medium and light u sers based on the hours. The methodo logical app roach of this study is mixed. Both qualitative and quantitative tec hniques are applied. A t the. At t he second phase, based on the objectives and research questions two different statistical methods. The details. Hair, J r. Table 4: Methodological Details of the Study. Hair, Jr. Statistical Methods Used. Nature of the Analysis Data Collection. Quantitative Structured Questionnaire. Target Population: The target p opulation of the st udy is the students fro m different academic institut ions o f. More specifically, the students o f colleges and universities, those are aged from 18 to The sampling technique of this study is a multiple-stage sampling process, whereas at the first stage.

At the second stage, a sample fra me list of the uni versities in Dhaka city. At the final stage, a single stratum i s selected among the 10 strata b y following a simple. On which, 45 0 students are attentive students and are inattentive students. A structured questionnaire is prepared to conduct a survey on the sampled units students containing the. Theoretical Framework. The electronic format of the questionnaire is delivered t o the students through e-mail.

For the sake of preparing error-. Results and Implications of Discriminant Analysis. Table 5 a: Table 5 b: Pooled within-groups correlations between discriminating variables. Table 5 c: Predicted Group Membership. Students Attentive vs. Inattentive 1 2 Total. Original Count 1 6 Count 1 9 Actual Group No. Percent of grouped cases correctly classified: Mor e precisely, based on the discriminant function, F- test value,.

But the interesting fact is, ba d and. Figure 3: Box 2: Notations, Parameters and Accept able Values. Malhotra, ; Hair, Jr. There are certain limitations of this study. First, the moderating effect of the demographic factors i. Second, there could some other p urposes of using. I n that case, the effect. So, these limitations can be resolved in fu rther. This study is merely an explorative research initia tive, whereas it was tried to investigate that what is happening.

Motivation and m ass-awareness about technology. Alfarani, L. T hessaloniki, Greece: Mobile-phone users in Bangladesh cross million mark. Bomhold, C. Educational Use of Smart Phone Technology: A survey of mobile phone application use. Electronic Lib rary and Information Systems, 47 4 ,. Buck, J. The New Frontier of Education: The Impact of Smartphon e. Technology i n t he Classroo m. American Society for Engineering. Burgess, S. Use of traditional and smartphone ap p flashcard s in an introductor y.

Journal of Instructiona l Pedagogies , Burns, R. Caverly, D. Mobile Learni ng and Access. Journal of Developmental. Education, 33 1 , Christou, C. Investigating Smartpho ne and Smartphone-Apps Utilization: A survey among Cypriot. University St udents. Thessaloniki, Greece: Ebiye, E. Library Philosophy and Practice , Evans, M. Mobility, Ga mes, and Education: Handbook o f Research on Effective. Handboo k of Research.

GSMA Intelligence. Analysis Coun try Overview: Mob ile for Development Impact. Halder, I. Undergraduate Student's Use of Mobile Phones: Exploring Use of. Advanced Technologic al Aids for Educatio nal Purpose. Journal of Med ia and Communication Studies,. Jesse, G. Using Smartphones Effectively for. Social and Educational Needs. Ketheeswaran, K. Centres o f the Open University of Sri Lanka. Kibona, L. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering.

Kumar, M. Technical and P rofessional Studies: Indian Perspective. International Journal of Ma naging Information. Technology, 3 3 , Lekka, A. What ICT tools do undergraduate students use? Litchfield, S. Defining the S martphone. Retrieved from. Lohr, M. Secondary Education by the Use of Tablets.

Stay on target

Thessaloniki, G reece: Maiye, A. ICTs and Sustainable Development: A Capability P erspective. In Proceedings. Malhotra, N. Marketing Resea rch: An Applied Orientation. Ne w York: Pearson Education. McFarlane, A. Journal o f Education, 32 2 ,. Molnar, A. Bu lletin of the. Morphitou, R. Mtega, W. Using Mobile Phones for Teaching and. Learning Purposes in Higher Learni ng Institutio ns: Proceedings and report o f the 5th UbuntuNet Alliance annual conference. Ncube, S. Guidelines for. Retrieved fro m. Organista-Sandoval, J. Appr opriation and Educatio nal Uses of Mobile Phones.

Creative Education, Scientific Research, 5 ,. Pange, J. Prensky, M. What c an you learn from a cell phone? Almost an ything! Robinson, T.

Students with Smartphones Study More

Smartphone U se. A Questionnaire-Based Study. Journal of Medical. Hoc Networks. Thes saloniki, Greece: Sagor, M. Unleasing the Potentials of Mobile Advertisin g. Bangladesh Brand Forum: